Scenario: Consensus

As an Action Learning Coach how would you handle the following situation:

The team is having trouble reaching consensus on what the real problem is.

Tags: Action Learning Coach

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Dee Handyside

    |

    I was recently a group participant in this exact situation. If this has happened after a coach intervention and the coach has asked the team if they agree on the problem (yes or no), I would then ask them to take some time and write down what each member feels the problem is. After each member has read their understanding of the problem, I would again go around as ask if each person thinks they have consensus on the problem.

    I would say “the team clearly doesn’t have consensus here on what the problem is – how could we clarify this?” and wait for suggestions (hopefully someone will request further information from the problem presenter). After some more group discussion, I’d intervene again with the standard “Do you think the group is clear on what the problem is (yes or no) and again ask each individual to state their interpretation. This technique can need to happen several times in order to get clarification – and its amazing to see how individuals perceptions about the problem change – including the problem presenter!
    In our case, it became clear to the group that there were actually 2 problems. The coach asked the problem presenter which problem was the most urgent and pressing and the group was then back on track to providing solutions.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Chjames

    |

    Another context for this challenge is when a portion of the team writes down and then shares something that is more like a problem statement and others share something more like a goal statement, or statements that are a combination of the two. I have often asked something like, “What defines a problem statement?” The team usually realizes that they are not operating off the same definition, they iron out a single definition and then proceed back to working together on their problem statement. It helps remind the group to ask themselves and each other about checking in and agreeing to common definitions – an important leadership skill.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Carole

    |

    I really like the comment by CHJames–asking the group to define “problem statement” is a great intervention.

    Another thought: after a couple of rounds of asking the group to write down the problem, I might ask the group…”What question could you ask now that might help the group reach consensus on the problem?”

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Phil Cohen

    |

    This is very timely, as this exact scenario played itself out this afternoon during an AL session with a group using AL for the 1’st time. There were some great questions asked, several different positions on the problem were expressed. I had the group write down their problem definition; we reviewed their positions; we asked what different approach we might take to take to help reach consensus . In one intervention I asked “I notice that there are several viewpoints on the root of the problem. Would it be helpful if we took these one at a time and did a deeper analysis to determine their true impact on the problem?” Unfortunately , we only had one hour and we were starting to run tight on time. Because this was the 1’st time the group had used Action Learning I suggested and it was agreed that we would meet in two weeks to further define the problem. In the interim, an email would be sent to each participant outlining each group members understanding of the problem as they had written it. The group was asked to think about the approach we might take that would help us reach consensus.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    John Roberts

    |

    I too have been working with a group that is new to Action Learning. I have found that as a coach it is very tempting to jump in and push the team in the direction I think they should move. It never ceases to amaze me that if I am patient the group will eventually get there, and learn something about themselves and the process along the way. I have been using an adaptation of the “stages of effective problem solving” model that’s used in the foundations class. I use an LCD projector and just leave it up during the session. I will ask the group to write down their understanding of the problem and they quickly want to believe that they have consensus on the problem so they can move on (and it’s apparent that they really don’t). I will let them go on for a little while and then will ask them “what stage are we on in the effective problem solving model?” Eventually, they come back to clearly defining a problem statement. The group is really learning not only how to solve the problem they have been tasked with but also the importance of the “process” to solving any problem.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Daniel Belet

    |

    This consensus issue of the group seems to me a major point in the process of AL, as the end up solutions will be directly linked to the quallity of the upstream outcome. In case of trouble reaching a consensus I would suggest the problem presenter to express again his issue, may be with different words or some more details. This should raise more questions from the group and help, at least, some persons to get a new understanding about it. But as a previous comment righltly stresses it, the problem statement must not be confused with the goals in order to clarify the understanding of the very roots of the problem and also to prevent from braking the creativity potential of the group.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    DrBea

    |

    Great responses. Since it is for the team to decide when they are at consensus – I would simply ask – What would help us get to consensus?

    Depending on the team – I might ask – What does consensus mean?

    Happy Coaching
    Bea

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Min Chang

    |

    在最近一次MPAL中,PP提出的问题是“如何制定10月国庆黄金周假日促销方案,实现当月4G+手机销售量净增1000台”。团队成员与PP进行了10分钟的互动,半数以上成员认为从历史经验来看,如果仅仅只是黄金周假日促销,是无法实现“销售量净增1000台”,即PP的问题本身有缺陷,讨论陷入僵局。
    作为教练,我进行了适时干预:
    1、让每个成员把自己理解的问题写下来,然后读出来,最后请PP读出。
    2、询问大家“我们对问题是否达成一致意见?Yes or No?”2/3团队成员选择No;
    3、征询PP的意见“我观察到大家对问题没有达成共识,你希望大家如何帮助你?”PP回复他的目标是“10月4G+手机市场份额净增1000台”,之前的问题确实存在一些缺陷,他希望团队能帮他重新定位问题;
    4、询问团队成员是否同意多花费20分钟,帮助PP重新定位问题。全票同意后,由PP带领大家进行了团队共创,重新将问题描述为“如何在10月实现1000台存量2G/3G手机更换为4G+手机“;
    5、重复2的程序,大家全部回复Yes
    6、让团队成员对该环节表现进行1-10分评价,然后请他们说出“我们有什么地方做的好?什么地方可以做的更好?
    7、今后讨论中遇到类似的情景时,我们的解决方法是什么?”成员们订立了他们处理该类情景的规则,即2/3同意就可以继续下去,反之,则需要停下来解决争议。

    在上面的环节中,对PP和团队都是很大的挑战。作为教练,我需要确保讨论能继续下去,鼓励团队对问题进行重塑。同时这也是一个非常好的学习机会,能让成员学习订立团队规则,群策群力解决争议。

    Reply

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Conference Schedule Update

Please Note

The above WIAL Global Conference 2017 Schedule is subject to change.

Planning Your Conference

Please refer to the conference schedule on the WIAL China website for any last minute changes.

Click Here