Scenario: Agreement

As an action learning coach, how would you handle the following situation: The team has agreed they are at consensus as to the true nature of the problem. When you ask who has the next question they continue to question the nature of the problem versus moving towards solutions.

Tags: Action Learning, ActionLearning Coach, Team Coach, WIAL, WIAL Action Learning, WIAL Talk

Trackback from your site.

Comments (9)

  • Avatar

    Philippe Rion

    |

    I congratulate the group on reaching a consensus. I point out to them that we are now entering the reflection phase to find possible solutions. If the group has difficulties in getting started, I propose a time of silent reflection and to write their question that they will read to the PP. He/She will choose the question with which to begin this new phase!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Elisabetta Galli

    |

    I would gently lead back the team to their declared agreement on consensus on the nature of the problem and would comment that this should rigger a new phase that is focused on elaborating possible solutions. I would then invite them to reflect individually and to write down one question they would ask, looking at possible solutions. When finished, I would trigger the new round of questions

    Reply

  • Avatar

    ellen zhang

    |

    I will ask curiously: We have just reached a consensus on the nature of the problem, and now we question the nature of the problem again, what happened.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Kristi Alcouffe

    |

    I would say…”I’m going to intervene here. I’m observing that questions are still being asked about the nature of the problem, whereas, our Problem Presenter reformulated their initial question and we all have agreed there is a consensus. So Team, I will ask again, can we work with the Problem Presenter’s question? If yes, we are now in the 3rd phase of the session, devoted to the search for ideas and solutions to this problem”.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    MARISTELA GORAYB

    |

    As an action learning coach, if the team starts identifying actions before the end of the session, I would assess what stage the session is at. If you are in the phase of exploring the understanding or reformulating the problem to obtain consensus, I would make an initial intervention like this:
    Group, what stage are we in? How could we focus on understanding the problem?
    or yet:
    How much are our issues focused on understanding the problem?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Paulina Gucka

    |

    In such case I would intervene by attracting team’s attention to problem solving circle (stages of the problem solving process) that I usually have in the room. I would ask: “When you take a look on the circle & questions you are asking now, how do you think, at which stage are we as group?”. If they notice that they still ask about nature of the problem, I would ask: “What action will move our work forward?” or “How we want to proceed in order to move our work forward?” If they don’t notice that they are still asking about the nature of the problem, I would ask: “How do you want to proceed?” and observe what happens. Usually, even if the team doesn’t notice during intervention & they continue without changing the way of working, they notice later on and learn anyway.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Nguyen Viet Hai

    |

    I will intervene under the following assumption scenario
    Coach:Hello Team, let me remind everyone just a minute before we have had agreement on the problem – yes or no ?
    Team: yes
    Coach: what make we continue to question involves the problem when we are all have an agreement?
    Option 1: If the group still wants to clarify the problem, I will ask them to write down the problem statement again and ask them what was agreed upon, what needs to be clarified and following until the group agrees they are ready to move to solution
    Option 2: If The group relalizes they need to move foward to the solution. I will step out with the quesion “who has the next question?”

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Nguyen Viet Hai

      |

      I would intervene to remind the group that the group has previously agreed on the true nature of the problem by asking question
      “Hello Team, let me remind everyone just a minute before we have had agreement on the problem – yes or no ?” The team would answer yes as this scenario.
      After that, I would need help the team clarify by continue to ask question:”what make we continue to question involves the problem when we are all have an agreement?”
      Option 1: If the group still wants to clarify the problem, I will ask them to write down the problem statement again and ask them what was agreed upon, what needs to be clarified and following until the group agrees they are ready to move to solution
      Option 2: If The group relalizes they need to move foward to the solution. I will step out with the quesion “who has the next question?”

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Antonella Mediati

    |

    I would intervene and say “I have observed that the questions being asked are still focused on the nature of the problem, yet we just came to consensus a few minutes ago” Has anyone else observed this?

    Why is it important to move towards the solutioning phase at this point in our process?

    Considering we are in the solutioning phase and we are in agreement with the problem, what types of questions should be asked going forward to make the next X minutes left an effective learning process for all?

    Reply

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.